Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Created by volunteers, for you. Consider donating or advertising on this website to fuel our mission.

Can We STARVE CANCER? What You NEED TO KNOW! | Dr. Thomas Seyfried

Can We STARVE CANCER? What You NEED TO KNOW! | Dr. Thomas Seyfried

00:00:00 – The Environmental Causes of Cancer
00:08:54 – The Warburg Effect and Cancer Metabolism
00:17:49 – Cancer Cells and Energy Metabolism
00:27:27 – Warburg’s Misunderstanding and the Role of Fermentation in Cancer
00:36:27 – Autolytic Cannibalism and Glutamine Restriction
00:45:18 – Managing Glucose and Glutamine for Cancer Treatment
00:53:51 – Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for cancer treatment
01:02:14 – Therapeutic benefits in humans, dogs, and mice
01:10:45 – Pablo’s Story: Metabolic Diet Therapy for Glioblastoma
01:18:51 – The Link Between Insulin Resistance and Chronic Metabolic Diseases

The cancer field today focuses on mutations and targeting mutations, but it is the environment that puts us at risk for chronic diseases, including cancer. Fast food and processed carbohydrates disrupt healthy mitochondria, which are necessary for the prevention of cancer. To prevent cancer, it is important to maintain healthy mitochondria and avoid highly processed carbohydrate foods, exercise, and other unhealthy lifestyle choices.

The metabolic theory of cancer, which emerged in the 1900s from Otto Warburg, has been an accepted form of research and thinking for 30 years. This theory suggests that people with high blood sugar levels and diabetes have a higher risk of developing cancer. Otto Warburg’s work on the Warburg effect was initially discredited but has since evolved into a process that has led to advances in areas like immunotherapy and car T cells.

The metabolic theory of cancer has been developed by geneticists and biochemists, who have been working on epilepsy at Yale University. One student at the time was excited about the ketogenic diet for epilepsy, but the mainstream medical community did not care about it. However, Mariana Troto and others have been working on the effects of ketogenic diets on epileptic mice, and the field is now moving towards a more comprehensive understanding of cancer.

In conclusion, the metabolic theory of cancer has been a significant advancement in our understanding of cancer and its relationship with the environment. By focusing on the metabolic theory of cancer and incorporating it into our treatment plans, we can work towards a more effective and personalized approach to cancer prevention and treatment.

The study focused on two parallel projects: epilepsy and cancer biochemistry. They found that calorie restriction and restricted ketogenic diets improved seizure management in epilepsy mice. A drug called 60 Oxygen (BDNJ) was developed, which had an effect on epilepsy in pre-clinical models but not on cancer mice. The drug blocked sucrases in the gut, allowing the animals to eat food but not digest it, leading to decreased blood sugar levels.

The drug company initially thought it was a blockbuster drug for cancer because it was shrinking tumors. However, when the mice were fed a control group of mice, the tumors shrunk just as well in the control group as in the drug-treated mice. The drug was simply preventing the mice from eating and digesting food.

The researchers discovered that calorie restriction has a powerful effect on reducing cancer, particularly brain cancer. They found that calorie restriction reduces blood sugar and elevates ketones bodies, an evolutionarily conserved adaptation to food restriction. When we stop eating food for a long enough period, our brain goes into ketosis, mobilizing fats and making water-soluble ketones that go to the brain and allow the brain to burn energy in the presence of low glucose.

Calcium restriction is powerfully anti-angiogenic, meaning abnormal blood vessels and tumors are hammered, which is thought to be provocative to tumor growth. Anti-angiogenic therapies, such as those developed by Judah Volkman and Napoleon Ferrara, were often pulled off the market due to adverse effects.

Calorie restriction has been shown to be as powerful or more powerful than anti-angiogenic drugs, targeting inflammation and reducing tumor cells. This was demonstrated in mice and later applied to humans through water-only therapeutic fasting. The human body could achieve the same effects as mice with a calorie-restricted diet only if they followed a ketogenic diet.

Caterol restriction mimics calorie restriction by burning fat from fat stores, which can lead to decreased blood sugar and increased ketones. This concept was initially unpalatable but was later explored for cancer treatment. Warburg’s concepts were introduced, arguing that cancer cells have a defect in their mitochondria, which are responsible for producing energy through oxidative phosphorylation. When these mitochondria become defective, the end product of glycolysis is diverted to lactic acid, a waste product of the glycolytic pathway, which acidifies the cancer micro environment.

Warburg noticed that all major cancers produced large amounts of lactic acid, which accumulates in muscles when overexertion occurs. When oxygen is deficient, the muscles can be re-oxygenated and return to respiration. The muscle then uses local glucose to produce massive amounts of quick energy with the waste product of lactic acid, which goes back into the bloodstream during exercise and is created back to glucose.

In conclusion, calorie restriction has the potential to be a powerful treatment for various diseases, including cancer. By understanding the mechanisms of action behind calorie restriction and incorporating it into cancer treatments, we can develop more effective treatments for cancer.

The Cory cycle, a process that breaks down glucose into pyruvate and energy, is crucial in understanding the origin of cancer. Cancer cells, like other cells, can run on sugar, which is a dirty, burning fuel, leading to various diseases like diabetes and resistance.

The Krebs cycle, a secondary pathway, breaks down sugar and energy, making it an essential part of our lives. Understanding the Krebs cycle is crucial for managing cancer and other devastating diseases.

Warburg’s theory suggests that cancer cells don’t need oxygen for growth, and they can take all oxygen out of the system, allowing them to grow without oxygen. He argued that cancer cells replaced their oxidative phosphorylation with energy through fermentation, which is energy without oxygen. This process produces lactic acid as a waste product from the fermentation process.

Warburg’s argument was that cancer cells are resistant to cyanide, which is the key basis of all life. He showed that cancer cells can survive in cyanide, but they die quickly due to the mitochondria shutting down electron transport and the mitochondria shutting down electron transport.

In the 1920s, researchers showed that a rat with a tumor would die instantly when injected with cyanide, but the tumor would survive. However, the tumor was resistant to cyanide, and the cells could be grown and cultured.

In conclusion, the Krebs cycle and the Krebs cycle are crucial in understanding the origin of cancer and managing other diseases. By understanding these processes and their impact on cancer management, we can better manage and prevent the spread of cancer.

The mitochondrial metabolic theory of cancer suggests that cancer cells consume oxygen just as readily as normal cells, and therefore use oxidative phosphorylation for energy generation. However, this theory has been challenged by the fact that cancer cells do not use oxygen for ATP synthesis or generating energy through oxidative phosphorylation. Instead, they use it to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are carcinogenic and mutagenic.

Warburg’s theory was initiated over 100 years ago, but he did not know about glutamine fermentation, which is now known to be a major fermentable fuel. He assumed that the oxygen consumed by cancer cells even when it was low was still linked to oxidative phosphorylation. This calculation is somewhat in error, and oxygen consumption is also in error.

The cancer field today focuses on mutations and targeting mutations, which are not the cause of cancer. Most oncology today is focused on the idea that cancer results from genetic mutations in the cancer. However, there may be ways to improve cancer response to chemotherapy by identifying which genetic mutations there are and which drugs work better for which ones.

The metabolic theory holds promise for treating certain cancers, such as stage four melanoma, pancreatic cancer, and brain cancer, such as glioblastoma, which respond well to ketogenic diets. However, it is essential to navigate this new landscape where certain cancers are responding to a metabolic approach, rather than relying solely on genetic theories.

Cancer cells have a common metabolic problem, which is driven by fermentation. These cells use glucose and glutamine as fuels for their energy production, which is also fermented in the mitochondria. This pathway, called glutamanolysis, is a key part of the cancer process.

The main challenge in cancer treatment is to target the fermentation pathway, which is the main source of energy for cancer cells. Most treatments are toxic radiation and chemotherapy, which can be expensive and ineffective. Metabolic oncology, on the other hand, involves diet and other compounds that block some of these fermentation pathways, which have numerous benefits for overall metabolic health, including inflammation reduction, stem cell function, DNA repair, and oxidative stress management.

The origin of many diseases, such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and dementia, is systemic inflammation and chronic exposure to chemicals. These diseases often result from disturbed energy and metabolic homeostasis. The focus now is on understanding the mechanisms of how cancer cells grow in a dysregulated way, which is the cause of cell division out of control.

The organelle inside the cell that controls the cell cycle and regulates growth is the mitochondrion. Warburg and Orberg have validated the work of Orberg in their own work regarding mitochondrial fermentation pathways. By understanding the mechanisms behind cancer cells’ dysregulated growth, we can develop targeted therapies and treatments that can help combat the devastating effects of cancer.

Leave a Reply